Mcleod Russel India [MCLEODRUSS] vs Cian Agro Industries [CIANAGRO] Detailed Stock Comparison
TLDR: Quick Comparison Summary
Based on 19 vital metrics comparison: Mcleod Russel India Ltd. wins in 4 metrics, Cian Agro Industries & Infrastructure Ltd. wins in 13 metrics, with 1 ties. Cian Agro Industries & Infrastructure Ltd. appears stronger overall.
View Metrics Details
Vital Metrics Comparison
| Metric | Mcleod Russel India Ltd. | Cian Agro Industries & Infrastructure Ltd. | Better |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | -2.92 | 31.81 | Cian Agro Industries & Infrastructure Ltd. |
| Price-to-Book Ratio | 9.55 | 1.76 | Cian Agro Industries & Infrastructure Ltd. |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio | 3,010.15 | 62.05 | Cian Agro Industries & Infrastructure Ltd. |
| PEG Ratio | 0.05 | 0.00 | Tie |
| EV/EBITDA | -197.88 | 12.50 | Cian Agro Industries & Infrastructure Ltd. |
| Profit Margin (TTM) | -18.94% | 8.08% | Cian Agro Industries & Infrastructure Ltd. |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -1.65% | 21.46% | Cian Agro Industries & Infrastructure Ltd. |
| EBITDA Margin (TTM) | N/A | 21.46% | N/A |
| Return on Equity | -349.34% | 2.04% | Cian Agro Industries & Infrastructure Ltd. |
| Return on Assets (TTM) | -5.50% | 0.98% | Cian Agro Industries & Infrastructure Ltd. |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $483.04M | $1.36B | Cian Agro Industries & Infrastructure Ltd. |
| 1-Year Return | 84.52% | 225.90% | Cian Agro Industries & Infrastructure Ltd. |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) | 0.51 | 1.73 | Mcleod Russel India Ltd. |
| Enterprise Value | $24.97B | $47.38B | Cian Agro Industries & Infrastructure Ltd. |
| EV/Revenue Ratio | 2.10 | 2.29 | Mcleod Russel India Ltd. |
| Gross Profit Margin (TTM) | 71.22% | 33.76% | Mcleod Russel India Ltd. |
| Revenue per Share (TTM) | $114 | $739 | Cian Agro Industries & Infrastructure Ltd. |
| Earnings per Share (Diluted) | $-21.56 | $40.14 | Cian Agro Industries & Infrastructure Ltd. |
| Beta (Stock Volatility) | 0.31 | 1.10 | Mcleod Russel India Ltd. |
Mcleod Russel India Ltd. vs Cian Agro Industries & Infrastructure Ltd. Stock Performance Analysis
Loading Price Chart...
Performance Comparison
Short-term Returns
| Stock | 1D | 1W | 1M | 3M | 6M | YTD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mcleod Russel India Ltd. | 2.00% | -5.90% | 4.41% | 85.16% | 35.74% | 34.24% |
| Cian Agro Industries & Infrastructure Ltd. | 5.00% | 8.71% | 0.22% | 41.99% | 7.54% | 18.02% |
Long-term Returns
| Stock | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | 15Y | 20Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mcleod Russel India Ltd. | 84.52% | 206.06% | 69.18% | -66.98% | -75.64% | -22.93% |
| Cian Agro Industries & Infrastructure Ltd. | 225.90% | 3,740.38% | 4,155.26% | 24,478.40% | 24,478.40% | 24,478.40% |
Performance & Financial Health Analysis: Mcleod Russel India Ltd. vs Cian Agro Industries & Infrastructure Ltd.
| Metric | MCLEODRUSS | CIANAGRO |
|---|---|---|
| Market Information | ||
| Market Cap | ₹5.77B | ₹35.74B |
| Market Cap Category | Small cap | Small cap |
| 10 Day Avg. Volume | 768,574 | 99,790 |
| 90 Day Avg. Volume | 763,906 | 107,047 |
| Last Close | ₹65.40 | ₹1,612.95 |
| 52 Week Range | ₹28.50 - ₹78.41 | ₹385.10 - ₹3,633.15 |
| % from 52W High | -16.59% | -55.60% |
| All-Time High | ₹386.45 (Feb 18, 2013) | ₹3,633.15 (Oct 16, 2025) |
| % from All-Time High | -83.08% | -55.60% |
| Growth Metrics | ||
| Quarterly Revenue Growth | 0.20% | 0.63% |
| Quarterly Earnings Growth | 0.20% | 1.74% |
| Financial Health | ||
| Profit Margin (TTM) | -0.19% | 0.08% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -0.02% | 0.21% |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | -3.49% | 0.02% |
| Debt to Equity (MRQ) | 3,010.15 | 62.05 |
| Cash & Liquidity | ||
| Book Value per Share (MRQ) | ₹6.09 | ₹726.53 |
| Cash per Share (MRQ) | ₹2.13 | ₹6.28 |
| Operating Cash Flow (TTM) | ₹274.25M | ₹2.19B |
| Levered Free Cash Flow (TTM) | ₹-1,978,653,000 | ₹411.61M |
| Dividends | ||
| Last 12-Month Dividend Yield | N/A | N/A |
| Last 12-Month Dividend | ₹0.00 | N/A |
Valuation & Enterprise Metrics Analysis: Mcleod Russel India Ltd. vs Cian Agro Industries & Infrastructure Ltd.
| Metric | MCLEODRUSS (Apr 24, 2026) | CIANAGRO (Apr 24, 2026) |
|---|---|---|
| Price Ratios | ||
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | -2.92 | 31.81 |
| Forward P/E | N/A | N/A |
| PEG Ratio | 0.05 | 0.00 |
| Price to Sales (TTM) | 0.51 | 1.73 |
| Price to Book (MRQ) | 9.55 | 1.76 |
| Market Capitalization | ||
| Market Capitalization | ₹5.77B | ₹35.74B |
| Enterprise Value | ₹24.97B | ₹47.38B |
| Enterprise Value Metrics | ||
| Enterprise to Revenue | 2.10 | 2.29 |
| Enterprise to EBITDA | -197.88 | 12.50 |
| Risk & Other Metrics | ||
| Beta | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Book Value per Share (MRQ) | ₹6.09 | ₹726.53 |
Financial Statements Comparison: Mcleod Russel India Ltd. vs Cian Agro Industries & Infrastructure Ltd.
Financial Metrics
Loading Financial Charts...
Revenue
Operating Margin
Profit Margin
Long Term Debt
Income Flow Analysis
Financial Statements Comparison
Income Statement
| Metric | MCLEODRUSS (2025) | CIANAGRO (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue/Sales | 11.72B | 10.29B |
| Cost of Goods Sold | 1.47B | 7.24B |
| COGS % of Revenue | 12.6% | 70.3% |
| Gross Profit | 10.25B | 3.05B |
| Gross Margin | 87.4% | 29.7% |
| Research & Development | N/A | N/A |
| Operating Income (EBIT) | -365.02M | 1.20B |
| Operating Margin | -3.1% | 11.7% |
| EBITDA | 265.21M | 1.84B |
| EBITDA Margin | 2.3% | 17.9% |
| Pre-Tax Income | -2.45B | 456.01M |
| Pre-Tax Income % of Revenue | -20.9% | 4.4% |
| Income Tax | -467.04M | 44.40M |
| Income Tax % of Revenue | -4.0% | 0.4% |
| Net Income (Profit) | -1.98B | 411.61M |
| Profit Margin | -16.9% | 4.0% |
Balance Sheet & Liquidity Metrics
| Metric | MCLEODRUSS (2025) | CIANAGRO (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Cash & Equivalents | 85.45M | 20.34M |
| Total Current Assets | 2.81B | 9.32B |
| Total Current Assets % of Revenue | 24.0% | 90.5% |
| Total Current Liabilities | 33.17B | 11.53B |
| Total Current Liabilities % of Revenue | 283.1% | 112.0% |
| Long-Term Debt | 974.69M | 8.06B |
| Long-Term Debt % of Revenue | 8.3% | 78.4% |
| Total Shareholders Equity | 566.40M | 20.17B |
| Retained Earnings | -15.29B | -32.81M |
| Retained Earnings % of Revenue | -130.5% | -0.3% |
| Property, Plant & Equipment | 8.24B | 1.12B |
Cash Flow Statement Comparison
| Metric | MCLEODRUSS (2025) | CIANAGRO (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | 274.25M | 2.19B |
| Operating Cash Flow % of Revenue | 2.3% | 21.3% |
| Capital Expenditures | -225.03M | -1.46B |
| Free Cash Flow | 483.04M | 1.36B |
| FCF Margin | 4.1% | 13.2% |
| Debt Repayment | 0 | -1.34B |
| Common Stock Repurchase | N/A | N/A |
Short Interest & Institutional Ownership Analysis
| Metric | MCLEODRUSS | CIANAGRO |
|---|---|---|
| Shares Short | N/A | N/A |
| Short Ratio | N/A | N/A |
| Short % of Float | N/A | N/A |
| Shares Outstanding | 104.46M | 27.99M |
| Float Shares | 85.00M | 5.63M |
| % Held by Insiders | 16.67% | 77.51% |
| % Held by Institutions | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| % Held by Public | 83.33% | 22.49% |
Dividend Analysis & Yield Comparison: Mcleod Russel India Ltd. vs Cian Agro Industries & Infrastructure Ltd.
| Metric | MCLEODRUSS | CIANAGRO |
|---|---|---|
| Last 12-Month Dividend | ₹0.00 | N/A |
| Last 12-Month Dividend Yield | N/A | N/A |
| 3-Year Avg Annual Dividend | ₹0.00 | N/A |
| 3-Year Avg Dividend Yield | N/A | N/A |
| 3-Year Total Dividends | ₹0.00 | N/A |
| Ex-Dividend Date | N/A | N/A |